Does your writing style have fat instead of muscle? By leaving out certain words, you can tighten and tone your manuscript.
In thirty years as an editor, I’ve found the same fatty words bloat the style of many authors.
Here are two notorious phrases: “begin to” and “start to.” They contain empty calories without real nutrition. If you cut them from your diet your writing style will be come sharper and tighter.
Beginner writers are prone to overusing these two phrases. Editors need only glance at
the first page of a manuscript. If it contains “begin to” or “start to” (or both, perhaps even more than once), they know a beginner wrote this.
“Begin to” and “start to” are almost always unnecessary. If something happens, you don’t need to tell the reader that it starts to happen. Just let it happen.
She began to run.
Rain began to fall.
She started to shiver.
His lips started to quiver.
His lips quivered.
The dog started to growl.
The dog growled.
Use your wordprocessor’s Find & Replace tool to count how many times you’ve used “begin to” (begins to, beginning to, began to, begun to) and “start to” (starts to, started to, starting to).
You don’t need to cut every single “begin to” and “start to” – sometimes, when an action starts and is abandoned immediately, they help clarify what’s going on:
She began to walk home, but changed her mind after a few steps.
He started to paint the fence, but Jane halted his arm.
About four “begin” or “start” per novel are fine – but forty are a sign of fat-wobbling writing, and four hundred are definitely too much.
I’d love to hear from you. When you’ve checked your WiP for “begin to” and “start to,” post a comment to tell me how many you’ve found, and whether you’re going to cut some of them.
What other “wordy words” do you think writers can cut from from their word diet?
To learn more about Rayne Hall and where to buy her publications, visit Meet the Contributors.